Many One

There is either one universe or many universities. It's all a matter of perspective. Both are equally true. 

But when you have one, many are impossible. If you have many, one is impossible. That's a common mistake causing profound confusion. 

There cannot be separation and controlled variables in a universe. 

There cannot be variation and interaction in many universities. 

This is irrelevant from a pragmatic point of view, because there "relatively" true is good enough. To understand the universal fundamentals, it is the most important point of all points. 

Determined to experience free will

The never ending debate on free will is one of many in which a consensus is impossible to reach as long as we are not aware of our identity and place within existence as a whole. Opponents will forever be stuck in arguments pro or con the existence of free will, because they cannot conceive the fact that the supposed “agent” exercising this will is not a self made man. Were they ever to realize this, the whole debate would appear in all its confusion.
Whatever position you choose to take, you will find evidence for it to be true. If this was not so, the question would have been settled ages ago. To get around this, let’s restate the initial question so that both positions are equally correct.

Is the experience of having alternative options obligatory or optional?

Those who advocate free will might say it is obligatory, while those who deny free will can agree. As far as I know, there is no argument saying free will is something we can freely choose to have or not have. That would be a contradiction, right?
But if we are determined to experience free will as a antecedent to action, both determinism and free will are equally true. Free will can be defined as actually true, while being determined to have it is also true.
If we cannot realize this, the hydra of sub-categories will keep producing offspring. That is because human intelligence is determined to create a subjective, alternative reality attached to the one that objectively is there as it is. We are determined to freely interpret reality as we see fit, and if you do not know this, there will never be a definite answer to any of your questions.

Circles within a circle

This is one simple way in which to imagine the microscopic quantum perspective. Every single quantum state is both particle and wave, but they will display which depending on current context of states. Here, some are particular as to form a circle structure. If we were to measure them, we would find there is wave-nature in these particles. If we measure the wave states that are not circle, we would find particles there. All quantum states are both particle and wave. It is the ratio P/W that differs between discrete states. 

Note that all we have here is a quantum ocean of frequencies. There is no actual "circle" there, only frequencies propagated through this ocean of single states to finally make up the apperance of circle. That is also a configuration of state frequencies. 

Also note that these states are quantum sized. A grain of salt consists of approx 1.2x10^18 single states, all of both particle and wave quality. 

So you see that having quantum rotation in numerous single states making up the distinct shape of a circle is not a problem. You will never detect the quantum "leaps" between single states. They are simply too small, too many, and will therefore appear as a distinct line/curve. 

Quantum leaps without legs

When trying to make sense of quantum lingo, one thing is really bugging me. On the one hand, everyone agrees that quantum states are discrete and seems to flip from this to that without any continuous, seamless "going there". On the other hand, all I read about is how particles/waves are sent in directions, reflectors, detectors and whatnot. 

I do not geddit!

It's like we treat these quantum states as if they were tiny dwarfes walking the room. As if it had legs or a little propeller attached to it. 

All I can see is billions of quantum states, transfering in-formation of quanta and qualia, asking and telling "what and how much"? Knowing that, they interact and pass it on. I can't see them carry the info from here to there. Never the less, that's how most books/articles have it. 

No wonder things like entanglement and inference stays mysteries. 

Frankly speaking

Todays feeble attempt at enforcing some light on physics was a note to Frank Wilczek. The reason he was spammed was just that there was a contact form on his site. Perhaps he will read my "whatever it is" before deleting? Probably it is in the virtual bin at "I need someone...", but I thought that plea for falsification was better than begging for confirmation. I dunno, maybe I should really make an effort to forget about the whole thing and go back to Spotify and a cool beer...
_________________________________________________________________

Dear Frank, I need someone to falsify my ideas asap, but where is that guy/gal? However I try to express them, out comes everything that is not what I mean i.e. rambling rants and crackpottery. Where can I find someone who, just to have a good laugh, would take a brief look at my wierd world? I am completely alone and it is not that fun. Trust me, I really want to be convincingly outargued so I can kill this pet theory, because it is growing into a monster. Very poetic, very "take your med's bro"-ish, I know that all too well.

I don't have the right words, I can hardly do math and therefore it comes out like:

- Wave/particle duality can be expressed as alpha stable distubution, where light appears at the crest, when p on one side and w on the other have reached max system energy and thus collapse.

- Force is angular and orbital momentum, and these two make up the duality.

- You can only measure one side (p or w) of the dual system, but the other is there until the point of measure.

- Measuring one momentum will freeze it, so naturally the other half of the interactive system goes invisible.

- Freezing orbital momentum makes angular disappear as wave. Freezing angular makes orbital a little black hole.

- When this happens, energy is gone but force conserved (as always).

- With energy gone, no wave-ness is there to make detection possible.

- Energy is caused by the above interaction between a/o momentum, and thus a variable dependent on rate/magnitude of force interaction.

- Orbital spin/momentum causes time.

- Angular spin/momentum causes space.

- etc

I won't elaborate on how I have come to these, perhaps, useful ideas. It's a zen thing. But ultimately, if I'm correct, the universe has a very bright future indeed. Evolution is geared towards wave collapses as a means for generating energy -> mass -> complexity and obviously, more force interaction. There's a guy at MIT, J. England, that is close to connecting the physic dot with the bio dot.

As for me, my network of particle dots and wave connections have me tangled up so much I'd rather be untangled and go back to "normal". I'd like someone to put the above into the existing equations and accepted frameworks. I don't think anything new has to be calculated, because I've invented nothing. I just realized that everything is indeed a matter of enforced energy, including human consciousness.

Please kill my pet.

Sorry for the rant ;)

Who is Alpha and Omega?

I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.

So it is said, but what does it mean? Alpha is A for Angular

Omega is O for Orbital

Alpha is Space

Omega is Time

Alpha is Wave

Omega is Particle

The Bible may be a fairytale, a myth, but those are told by speaking mass, just like quantum theory is. They do not lie or make things up. Whatever is made comes directly from the workshop of reality. Ashes to ashes. Dust to dust. 

Only subjective and ignorant Ego takes credit and blame for the Self making of reality. But Ego is done, without realizing what happens. 

A/O is wave/particle duality. A shapedhifter looking for increased momentum/energy. When maxed up to be 100/100, it splits into pure light and pure gravity. That is when and where duality goes nondual. 

When is orbital

Where is angular

SpaceTime re-created in a collapse. 

That is God, the everywhere father of time. 

So reality is not that complicated when you get your Self out of the way and take an objective view. 

Imagine that...

Heaven and Hell

Peace Out

In a nuclear shell

Researching off the grid is fun, but also way too muck trial and error to be efficient. The fun part is when I find my "speculations" to match perfectly with some more credible source. For a moment I feel less alone. Today I found that the idea of protons and neutrons as orbits was in fact an old and even well established one. The nuclear shell model fits nicely with my theory of atom nuclei as angular momentum bent circular by gravity. The trouble when trying to learn about chemistry is that all texts has it backwards. What I consider gravity, i.e. orbital momentum, is depicted as electrons outside radiation, which is the angular momentum in nuclei. In my model, protons are distance/space contracted and bent by time/place at a gravitational center of electron orbit(s).
Up until today, the few I have told this (my wife and our dog) have given me a vacant stare at best. They both know that electrons orbit the nucleus. But then again, they and others cannot tell me what gravity is. Therefore, I've been forced to figure that out by myself.
Electrons carry gravitation and sometimes gravity is displaced by angular momentum. As long as there is observable energy, orbital and angular momentum always come together. In high energy radiation like gamma rays, the short wavelength comes from a high degree of orbital momentum, contracting the linear quality of angular momentum, paired with an equally high degree of angular momentum causing the wave to have velocity/direction despite its gravitational property. Without this orbital momentum, the gamma ray would be a straight line with zero energy.
Anyways, for the benefit of all sentient beings enlightened by light, good night!


http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/shell.html